I am pretty sure all screw drive lenses are already made and they are selling off stock. The 35 and 50 are so cheap it does not matter. The other consideration is who knows how long screw drive AF lenses will be supported with the in body drive motor and if you want to continue investment in them.Īll new lenses are AFS. Technically the 85 1.8 is a better lens at the wider stops in the corners.Īt the long end, it only means do you want a prime 1.4 or a bulky 70/200 zoom? So I say don`t bother.Ĩ0 1.4 is a much loved lens for its rendition. It is decent, just not 2.8ĥ0 1.4 is only better at 1.4 to 1.8 than the 50 1.8. If you ever move to FX, you will wish you had VR2 version. The new VR 2 is internal focus and the focal length shortens at closer distances, ie you only get 165 mm at 6 feet. Save the money.ħ0/200 VR1 will work on FX but is soft at longer lengths in the corners. The two primes you have are as good as a 17/55. You can'y go wrong with any of the lenses you mentioned When using any lens on DX even though say 85 becomes 127, it will still have the same characteristics of an 85, just with added reach. DX is great for getting more reach while FX gives better results at higher ISO's and your lenses will be what the effective FL is eg 50mm is 50mm rather then being 75 on DX. It really comes down to what you like to shoot. There is nothing wrong with the IQ of DX. The 85 1.4 is awesome on a DX frame comes close to 127mm on DX and is wonderful for portraits, while the 50 will have a 75mm reach. If your going to stick with DX I'd save some money and grab the 17-55 over the 24-70. It's a stunning piece of glass! You will definitely notice a difference with pro glass over kit glass. The 70-200mm VR I was designed with DX in mind though it works on on FX and Film bodies as well. First off, I think the D300 is a pro caliber body and from iso 200 up it's the best Nikon DX body.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |